the only difference is that the kernel exploit for 6.72 can achieve a 100% success rate and 100% stability where 9.00 is one of the worst exploits only overpassed by the 7.55 one.
i don't need to be convinced because I know it. I have anything against 9.00 but the kernel exploit is not stable at all, and it is required much work on it, in order to stabilize it.
6.72 is the 100%. Neither the 5.05 is reaching status of it. But the 9.00 is a joke in comparisson with 6.72 or 5.05. And no, the new webkit part in 9.00 makes no differences on it.
All the kernel exploits are unfinished, and all of them need...
the new webexploit is changing anything. other than require less time to get loaded, the webkit part. Kernel part is the same, os 2 out of 5 still crash.
but
if the advantage is that for only the 9.00 because the usb... what the matters if the exploit is failing 2 times each 5 ?
I can't see any advantage, maybe you can explain better.
The problem with X party blocked X bill that would have prevented X is that yes the bill probably would have worked great, buuuttt they put XYZDCBG in said bill as an attempt to sneak things in that tend to be completely unrelated to the original bills intent. It sucks because if they would just do a single thing they could probably get something done...