GitLab has taken down the Suyu Nintendo Switch emulator

Suyu-728x410.png

Emulator takedowns continue. Not long after its first release, Suyu emulator has been removed from GitLab via a DMCA takedown. Suyu was a Nintendo Switch emulator forked from Yuzu emulator, which was the high-profile subject of a takedown by Nintendo last month. GitLab deleted Suyu's repository, stating that they'd received a takedown notice for the project. The tongue-in-cheek named emulator still has an official website up, though the Discord is not allowing new members, and the GitLab download page is gone. However, it seems a self-hosted download page is still available.

:arrow: Source
:arrow: Takedown notice (courtesy of gamingonlinux)
 

PopcornSweetie

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2022
Messages
297
Trophies
0
Location
New York
XP
1,085
Country
United States
Oh oh oh. I am sad to see them being pulled. Their main goal is not piracy and at this point. (Even if this is not Nintendo) Nintendo is just trying to take down everything that is bugging them, whenever it's part of the fucking law or not. They are looking at stuff like Professor Layton, having Phoenix Wright like grate attorneys.
 

anotherthing

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2023
Messages
250
Trophies
0
Age
52
XP
344
Country
United States
I think Nintendo's real target is Citra, not Yuzu. Their legal argument has to do with TotK, but why take so long for them to sue? If they want, they could have destroyed Yuzu and Ryujinx a long time ago.
I don't think Citra was the target. I think this was all because of the "Switch 2", which is probably very similar to the Switch we have now. If they want the next console to be backwards compatible with the Switch, which has a bazillion titles for it, then they're also opening the door for something like a ntrboot hack. You'll notice that they delayed the announcement of the next console to next Spring at the same time they started going after Yuzu and some of the hacking software for the Switch.

Now, having said that, considering the Citra Team were issuing updates right up until they announced their agreement with Nintendo, and it was an agreement done completely outside the courts, makes me think there's more to this than what the press release said on the subject. Citra was never a part of this right up until the agreement. Consider this, there's SNES emulators for the original DS, yet the SNES Virtual Console titles can only run on a New 3DS. If they want their next gen console to have 3DS titles on their Nintendo Online service, Nintendo now has the code to do that.

Since there's absolutely no reason to take Citra down, but the Citra Team took it down along with Nintendo, and this was done very quickly(Citra and Yuzu were updated over the weekend before the agreement) and outside of any public court record, I'd be willing to bet that Nintendo either hired the core Citra Team or bought their work despite what both sides said publicly.
 

DJPlace

going hire Ronald McDonald To Gun Down Nintendo.
Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
5,857
Trophies
2
Age
41
XP
4,681
Country
United States
nintendo needs to focus on making there new system or whatever the fuck it is. leave emulation of this gen alone you prick's or i'm going add more fuel to fire on your asses don't forget i am the boycotter of newer nintendo stuff and my mother FUCKING gun's prove it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaTh

gisel213

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
462
Trophies
1
Age
41
Location
Delaware
XP
825
Country
United States
I don't think Citra was the target. I think this was all because of the "Switch 2", which is probably very similar to the Switch we have now. If they want the next console to be backwards compatible with the Switch, which has a bazillion titles for it, then they're also opening the door for something like a ntrboot hack. You'll notice that they delayed the announcement of the next console to next Spring at the same time they started going after Yuzu and some of the hacking software for the Switch.

Now, having said that, considering the Citra Team were issuing updates right up until they announced their agreement with Nintendo, and it was an agreement done completely outside the courts, makes me think there's more to this than what the press release said on the subject. Citra was never a part of this right up until the agreement. Consider this, there's SNES emulators for the original DS, yet the SNES Virtual Console titles can only run on a New 3DS. If they want their next gen console to have 3DS titles on their Nintendo Online service, Nintendo now has the code to do that.

Since there's absolutely no reason to take Citra down, but the Citra Team took it down along with Nintendo, and this was done very quickly(Citra and Yuzu were updated over the weekend before the agreement) and outside of any public court record, I'd be willing to bet that Nintendo either hired the core Citra Team or bought their work despite what both sides said publicly.

Honestly I bet they tried a image of a switch 2 game probably still xci nsp and probably same keys... it probably booted scaring the shit outta them now that would be funny... but wait it's nintendo we're talking about lazy on security puts out 1st trillion switches with unpatchable bug... changes offsets to block rcm yet system loads everything the same after that.... random chip to bypass lazy security and bam same loading after boot up great security lol This whole thing is Nintendos own fault.
 

Jayinem

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Messages
724
Trophies
0
XP
1,752
Country
United States
Yuzu wasnt shut down by the dmca they voluntarily shut down after a Nintendo lawsuit, but now dmca can just shutdown emulators?
 

ShadowOne333

QVID PRO QVO
Editorial Team
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
12,258
Trophies
2
XP
35,080
Country
Mexico
Yuzu wasnt shut down by the dmca they voluntarily shut down after a Nintendo lawsuit, but now dmca can just shutdown emulators?

It was the inevitable next step once Yuzu folded.
Now Nintendo will aim to strike down any emulator for current gen consoles.

If I were the Ryujinx guys, I'll be making mirrors on other repo sites outside Gitlab and Github, something outside US jurisdiction would be the best in this case.
 

Ryab

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2017
Messages
3,286
Trophies
1
XP
4,562
Country
United States

Emulator takedowns continue. Not long after its first release, Suyu emulator has been removed from GitLab via a DMCA takedown. Suyu was a Nintendo Switch emulator forked from Yuzu emulator, which was the high-profile subject of a takedown by Nintendo last month. GitLab deleted Suyu's repository, stating that they'd received a takedown notice for the project. The tongue-in-cheek named emulator still has an official website up, though the Discord is not allowing new members, and the GitLab download page is gone. However, it seems a self-hosted download page is still available.

:arrow: Source
:arrow: Takedown notice (courtesy of gamingonlinux)
What seems interesting is that we don't even know if this was Nintendo or Gitlab themselves. I wouldnt be shocked if Gitlab was taking it down here.
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,829
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,797
Country
United States
One problem, Nintendo can still sue them, doesn't matter whether they're right or wrong and in the US AFAIK you don't automatically get legal costs back.
There would be no legal basis for a lawsuit, so any judge worthy of their position would toss it as frivolous. You're correct however that Nintendo relies on the victims defendants not having the money or legal representation necessary to fight back.

It also doesn't help that Yuzu settled leaving everything ambiguous in terms of the actual legality.
Legality stays exactly where it was with the precedent set by the Bleem case. Pre-trial settlements cannot and do not alter established case law.
 

MikaTh

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 19, 2017
Messages
39
Trophies
0
Age
28
XP
302
Country
Brazil
What... the switch not stable enough for you?
i mean... A system that can barely play it's own games while not having half the features previous systems from the same family had and also having the most broken controllers nintendo ever made (not even my n64 controllers broke as fast as the joy con)... yeah it isn' stable enough.
 

ShadowOne333

QVID PRO QVO
Editorial Team
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
12,258
Trophies
2
XP
35,080
Country
Mexico
i mean... A system that can barely play it's own games while not having half the features previous systems from the same family had and also having the most broken controllers nintendo ever made (not even my n64 controllers broke as fast as the joy con)... yeah it isn' stable enough.

Feature removal is a side-effect of Nintendo being fucking paranoid of exploits, hence not even having a basic internet browser on the thing.
The same applies for media players and other things, it's like Nintendo punishes customers for their own negligence, stupidity and lack of proper security.
if this doesn't scream anticonsumer I don't know what does.
 

tech3475

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,717
Trophies
2
XP
6,139
Country
There would be no legal basis for a lawsuit, so any judge worthy of their position would toss it as frivolous. You're correct however that Nintendo relies on the victims defendants not having the money or legal representation necessary to fight back.


Legality stays exactly where it was with the precedent set by the Bleem case. Pre-trial settlements cannot and do not alter established case law.

Not necessarily, depending on the judge and POTENTIAL contradictions in the the good old DMCA (/s):
https://gbatemp.net/threads/the-unknowns-of-emulation-a-breakdown-of-yuzu-v-nintendo.650187/

For the record, I'd hope Nintendo lose any such lawsuit, but I suspect we'd need a martyr like Bleem! To remove any ambiguity/potential legal vectors for Nintendo and create a precedent for emulators of systems utilising encryption.

That said, I wonder how Nintendo would react if there was an emulator which required everything to be pre-decrypted and the emulator devs gave zero hints as to how to acquire them.....wouldn't be surprised if they still tried, even if there was zero legal backing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaTh

Kioku

猫。子猫です!
Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
12,030
Trophies
3
Location
In the Murderbox!
Website
www.twitch.tv
XP
16,215
Country
United States
i mean... A system that can barely play it's own games while not having half the features previous systems from the same family had and also having the most broken controllers nintendo ever made (not even my n64 controllers broke as fast as the joy con)... yeah it isn' stable enough.
I mean... there's a joke in my post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaTh

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    im sure half the responses won't be literal racial slurs or "drop table" jokes
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Look, it's China. They know what it's like when you give a poll to half a billion trolls.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    How much dollar do you think it is?
  • Veho @ Veho:
    ONE MILLION DOLLA
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I know the pricing of electronics nowadays isn't "how much it actually costs" but "how much we can get away with", but putting up a poll is just cynical.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Probably $150 someone said Anbernic said around the same price as rg556
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    you know which game i wish they would rerelease
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    sonic unleashed
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Make it a happy meal toy
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    that game's engine is really fucking intensive so it runs like literal shit on xbox 360 and ps3
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Nah I'm getting value creep again. I look at a $50 console "but for just a few more dollars you could get XYZ" and I end up considering the Steam Deck.
    +1
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    like the lighting in that game was genuinely so good
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Not getting dragged into that again.
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    i dont get why they didn't port the one game that ran the worst on consoles, to pc
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    like you port everything to pc except the one game where it would make the most sense. why. what do you gain from this
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    is sega just personally fucking with me? are they laughing while watching me through my kinect camera as i get up to restart my xbox for the third time because the game froze again
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Buy handhelds from five below better quality
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Valve probably going to do another refresh of the deck this fall with rog ally like specs tbh
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    A smaller form factor would be nice too.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    A shield portable 2 would be nice aye Nvidia
    +2
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    The big leap in all things tech is when carbon based chips start hitting.
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Longer battery life cooler temps and faster! What's not to like lol (probably expensive as hell)
  • AncientBoi @ AncientBoi:
    [checks my dildo(s) batteries, coolant and lube] :O [promptly replaces them] :D
    AncientBoi @ AncientBoi: [checks my batteries, coolant and lube] :O [promptly replaces them] :D