The Switch is both a portable and home console.
How does Nintendo plan to explain to parents that their portable games are now $60 versus the 3DS $40?
Parents will be shocked to see that Pokemon is now $60.
Edited:
I mean now Switch has introduced a new category, one hardware that plays handheld game and gaming on TV.
1. Every publisher will be tempted to choose to price their games $60 because they need more effort to release games playable in mobile mode and big screen mode.
If their multiplat games look pixelated in the big screen, why bother paying $60?
If their multiplat games has slowdown, look worse in mobile mode and shorten the battery life, why bother buying a Switch version of games?
If it's not mandatory for games to have big screen mode and mobile mode, why bother buying Switch version of games at $60?
2. Nintendo will probably not price any of their games lower than $60 since Switch is a new category, which is a hybrid.
How does Nintendo plan to explain to parents that their portable games are now $60 versus the 3DS $40?
Parents will be shocked to see that Pokemon is now $60.
Edited:
I mean now Switch has introduced a new category, one hardware that plays handheld game and gaming on TV.
1. Every publisher will be tempted to choose to price their games $60 because they need more effort to release games playable in mobile mode and big screen mode.
If their multiplat games look pixelated in the big screen, why bother paying $60?
If their multiplat games has slowdown, look worse in mobile mode and shorten the battery life, why bother buying a Switch version of games?
If it's not mandatory for games to have big screen mode and mobile mode, why bother buying Switch version of games at $60?
2. Nintendo will probably not price any of their games lower than $60 since Switch is a new category, which is a hybrid.
Last edited by Bowl0l,