The FCC has voted to restore net neutrality, reversing ruling from 2017

fcc.png

In 2017, the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) repealed net neutrality. At the time, it was a major controversy between internet service providers and the public, as getting rid of net neutrality gave businesses the ability to alter and throttle customers' internet speed depending on the websites they visited. Years later, under a new administration, the FCC has reinstated net neutrality, after a 3-2 vote. This change allows for the FCC to step in, oversee, and ensure that internet providers are offering an "open internet experience" to broadband consumers.

Reacting to the ruling, David Greer, Director of Fight for the Future, a nonprofit organization that campaigned heavily for net neutrality, said the following,

Telecom giants like AT&T and Comcast have spent millions on lobbying and used every dirty trick in the book to try to prevent the return of net neutrality. But they keep losing. Because people from across the political spectrum overwhelmingly agree they don’t want their phone company to dictate how they use the internet, or screw them over more than they already do.

Meanwhile, Brendan Carr, a commissioner of the FCC who voted against net neutrality had an opposing view to the decision, stating,

My concern is that there's no reason for the government to go down this path of granting itself more powers to second guess all the decisions about the internet functions. So my worry is that it's a power grab without any need or justification, and it's very difficult to predict the harms that could ultimately flow from that

:arrow: Source
 

CMDreamer

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
1,721
Trophies
1
Age
39
XP
3,578
Country
Mexico
[...]​

Meanwhile, Brendan Carr, a commissioner of the FCC who voted against net neutrality had an opposing view to the decision, stating,

My concern is that there's no reason for the government to go down this path of granting itself more powers to second guess all the decisions about the internet functions. So my worry is that it's a power grab without any need or justification, and it's very difficult to predict the harms that could ultimately flow from that
"Power to the people", as the most famous Rock Band in the world has said.

The main need is freedom/liberty and the justification lies on his Constitution.

And the "harms" he clearly foresees -even if he don't want to make a prediction about them-, are for the big companies loosing their control over the internet and people browsing it, companies that -most likely- have made huge payments into his wallet.

His argument is as valid as stating that the internet must be controlled "for the good of the people".
 
Last edited by CMDreamer,

Guacaholey

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
479
Trophies
0
Age
27
XP
1,251
Country
United States

In 2017, the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) repealed net neutrality. At the time, it was a major controversy between internet service providers and the public, as getting rid of net neutrality gave businesses the ability to alter and throttle customers' internet speed depending on the websites they visited. Years later, under a new administration, the FCC has reinstated net neutrality, after a 3-2 vote. This change allows for the FCC to step in, oversee, and ensure that internet providers are offering an "open internet experience" to broadband consumers.

Reacting to the ruling, David Greer, Director of Fight for the Future, a nonprofit organization that campaigned heavily for net neutrality, said the following,



Meanwhile, Brendan Carr, a commissioner of the FCC who voted against net neutrality had an opposing view to the decision, stating,



:arrow: Source
Somebody should tell Carr there's no reason for telecom companies to be throttling a paid service in the first place. If you're paying for a 1Gbps service you should be able to effectively stream shows and movies and share files. That's pretty much the only reason TO get a good internet plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SylverReZ

AndorfRequissa

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Messages
211
Trophies
0
Age
40
XP
567
Country
United States
the reason they did this was AI. u peons are being enslaved and dont even know it. it will be illegal not to use AI and now u net nuetrality forces everyone to adopt AI.

anyone saying this is a good thing I bet has a bunch of IOT devices in there house like a dumbass
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • HiradeGirl @ HiradeGirl:
    Would you recommend a Meta Quest 2 as first low budget headset?
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @BigOnYa, Maybe he doesn't know how to type words for shit.
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    GBAtemp should be legally obligated to ban them, as its against the law to collect information from users under 13 because of COPPA. :tpi:
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @NinStar, Super Monkey Ball: Banana Blitz
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @HiradeGirl, Why not get an Oculus?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    VR is like 3D TVs in my opinion it's cool and all but it doesn't have enough great content.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @Psionic Roshambo, Porn exists, Psi.
    +1
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    I'm sure you'll live with it.
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    VR had the chance to integrate with existing games and tech but VR companies said "NO, I WANT MY SHIT TO BE STANDALONE AND MY GAMES EXCLUSIVE TO FACEBOOK"
    +2
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Back when Oculus Rift was still starting out and being demoed around, they modded existing games to use it as a 360° immersive screen thing and that was AMAZING.
    +2
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    The tech isn't there for affordable power enough VR headsets at a good market value yet sadly, oculus had a good idea but didn't have enough funds for marketing iirc
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    But now it's "can I use my VR set with my racing games, that would be neat?" "ONLY IF YOU USE OUR DILDOSTICK CONTROLLERS AND RUN THE GAME ON OUR ANDROID-UNDERPOWERED BRICK"
    +2
  • Veho @ Veho:
    The tech to have quality VR goggles at an affordable price is here, but every set has to have 4 additional controllers and be standalone.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    These are the same type of gamers that spend $2,000 on a GPU when a $600 GPU gives nearly the same outcome which is what the market looks at for them to do spend more on unneeded bs
    +2
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    If we're talking AAA titles a vr headset would be priced at nearly the same cost as a midrange gaming pc maybe even double
    +2
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    https://www.walmart.com/ip/3439939603 this is cool a portable blackstone
    +2
  • Veho @ Veho:
    The investment group?
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think they should bring back the shutter glasses for VR put 120Hz screen in for 60FPS and even a basic phone these days can pull that off
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Head tracking cameras and all
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Have a USB type C connector for power and controller done
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Micro SD would be nice also :angry:
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @K3Nv2, The types of gamers who pay $2,000 for RGB everything, and to run bloated Windows.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    My m.2 needs rgb makes transfers faster thank you
    +1
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: My m.2 needs rgb makes transfers faster thank you +1