Good job sincerely posting an article that is absolutely mocking the shit out of you.
My evidence to prove Earth is Flat + The other realms' hidden continents
- Thread starter cornerpath
- Start date
- Views 10,759
- Replies 155
- Likes 2
- Status
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...onspiracy-theorists-2024-eclipse/72849962007/
I didn’t start that thread anyway.
Yea that's a satire article and not a very good one, I stopped reading at some point.
What NASA owes to Hollywood?
NASA did not keep the tape of the Apollo 11 moon landing. Hollywood helped.
Supporters of the theory that Armstrong was not on the Moon, but only in a movie studio, will now have something to talk about. NASA did not keep the tape with the footage of the landing! But where NASA can't, Hollywood will help...
The embarrassing fact that NASA sent a man to the Moon but did not keep a tape of the landing was announced yesterday, on the 40th anniversary of the launch of Apollo 11, by a spokesman for the American space agency. NASA simply reused the media, erasing its previous, priceless content! Fortunately, Hollywood came to the rescue.
Landing in HD
The Casablanca studio sharpened and cleaned the preserved, snowy copies of the landing coverage, making the film much better now than what audiences saw 40 years ago. The material was provided by four copies of reports from the landing that NASA sent to various television stations four decades ago. – "Nothing was added or artificially created," says Dick Nafzger, the engineer responsible for the entire film project. - "However, you can now see new details," he adds.
To many viewers, the films will seem new because of their extraordinary quality. In the 1969 version, for example, Armstrong's face was not visible - it was blurred. Today we will see his facial expressions through the helmet's visor, as well as the reflection of the Moon's surface on the helmet. The first part of the effects of the work of Hollywood specialists has already been made available to viewers on the NASA website at: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/hd/apollo11.html
The landing coverage restoration project cost $230,000. So far, 40 percent have been developed. tapes, which took several months. Renovated fragments include: the scene of Armstrong descending the ladder to the surface of the Silver Globe, planting the US flag there and Buzz Armstrong's descent to the surface of the Moon.
The search for tapes recording the first landing of humans on the Moon began three years ago. Originally there were 45 of them, but as it turned out, they were deleted and reused during subsequent NASA missions. A detailed report on how this happened will be released in a few weeks. It is already known that the original recordings were kept throughout the 1970s and deleted only in the 1980s, when NASA ran out of tapes to record subsequent missions. At that time, approximately 200,000 recordings were deleted from the archive.
Nafzger, who was responsible for the TV broadcast in 1969, explains that the 15-minute tapes stored in the archive were treated mainly as data, not a record of historical events - hence the decision to delete them. Historians, of course, still cannot shake off their horror. "It's surprising that NASA didn't have the sense to preserve what were perhaps the most important documents of the 20th century," said historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University. "NASA has preserved many of the gadgets and items associated with the Apollo 11 mission, so the fact that tapes is very disturbing," he says. As he says, the digitally corrected copies look great, but nothing can replace the opportunity for historians to work with the original.
In turn, Roger Launius, a former NASA historian, is not surprised by the disappearance of the recordings. – “It was a mistake, there is no doubt,” he says. - “But this is due to the policy of the entire federal government, which does not believe that it is important to retain similar certificates. It's like a mentality straight from 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' - the treasure disappears somewhere among other similar boxes..." The comparison to Indiana Jones films is not accidental - it was the "Casablanca" studio that renewed the entire series, including "Raiders...".
The moon is gray anyway
Despite their experience, specialists from "Casablanca" have no doubts - the tapes recording the Apollo 11 landing are the worst quality material they have ever worked on. They managed to make the copy into a movie that was "slightly better" than the original. The report is still black and white, no one has considered the possibility of coloring it. Besides – the moon is gray anyway!
Why the low transmission quality? 40 percent image quality involved converting the material sent from the Moon to a format that could be broadcast on "terrestrial" television. – "If NASA had fabricated this film, it would certainly have been made in better quality," comments Mike Inchalik from the "Casablanca" studio.
The reconstruction was based on four copies of reports from the Moon, from CBS News, the National Archives, Australian television, and a video recording from a camera that... filmed the TV screen on July 20, 1969.
At yesterday's press conference regarding the missing tapes, Armstrong had the last word - his letter regarding the video recording from the mission was read. "I'm surprised that anything has survived at all," he said.
NASA did not keep the tape of the Apollo 11 moon landing. Hollywood helped.
Supporters of the theory that Armstrong was not on the Moon, but only in a movie studio, will now have something to talk about. NASA did not keep the tape with the footage of the landing! But where NASA can't, Hollywood will help...
The embarrassing fact that NASA sent a man to the Moon but did not keep a tape of the landing was announced yesterday, on the 40th anniversary of the launch of Apollo 11, by a spokesman for the American space agency. NASA simply reused the media, erasing its previous, priceless content! Fortunately, Hollywood came to the rescue.
Landing in HD
The Casablanca studio sharpened and cleaned the preserved, snowy copies of the landing coverage, making the film much better now than what audiences saw 40 years ago. The material was provided by four copies of reports from the landing that NASA sent to various television stations four decades ago. – "Nothing was added or artificially created," says Dick Nafzger, the engineer responsible for the entire film project. - "However, you can now see new details," he adds.
To many viewers, the films will seem new because of their extraordinary quality. In the 1969 version, for example, Armstrong's face was not visible - it was blurred. Today we will see his facial expressions through the helmet's visor, as well as the reflection of the Moon's surface on the helmet. The first part of the effects of the work of Hollywood specialists has already been made available to viewers on the NASA website at: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/hd/apollo11.html
The landing coverage restoration project cost $230,000. So far, 40 percent have been developed. tapes, which took several months. Renovated fragments include: the scene of Armstrong descending the ladder to the surface of the Silver Globe, planting the US flag there and Buzz Armstrong's descent to the surface of the Moon.
The search for tapes recording the first landing of humans on the Moon began three years ago. Originally there were 45 of them, but as it turned out, they were deleted and reused during subsequent NASA missions. A detailed report on how this happened will be released in a few weeks. It is already known that the original recordings were kept throughout the 1970s and deleted only in the 1980s, when NASA ran out of tapes to record subsequent missions. At that time, approximately 200,000 recordings were deleted from the archive.
Nafzger, who was responsible for the TV broadcast in 1969, explains that the 15-minute tapes stored in the archive were treated mainly as data, not a record of historical events - hence the decision to delete them. Historians, of course, still cannot shake off their horror. "It's surprising that NASA didn't have the sense to preserve what were perhaps the most important documents of the 20th century," said historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University. "NASA has preserved many of the gadgets and items associated with the Apollo 11 mission, so the fact that tapes is very disturbing," he says. As he says, the digitally corrected copies look great, but nothing can replace the opportunity for historians to work with the original.
In turn, Roger Launius, a former NASA historian, is not surprised by the disappearance of the recordings. – “It was a mistake, there is no doubt,” he says. - “But this is due to the policy of the entire federal government, which does not believe that it is important to retain similar certificates. It's like a mentality straight from 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' - the treasure disappears somewhere among other similar boxes..." The comparison to Indiana Jones films is not accidental - it was the "Casablanca" studio that renewed the entire series, including "Raiders...".
The moon is gray anyway
Despite their experience, specialists from "Casablanca" have no doubts - the tapes recording the Apollo 11 landing are the worst quality material they have ever worked on. They managed to make the copy into a movie that was "slightly better" than the original. The report is still black and white, no one has considered the possibility of coloring it. Besides – the moon is gray anyway!
Why the low transmission quality? 40 percent image quality involved converting the material sent from the Moon to a format that could be broadcast on "terrestrial" television. – "If NASA had fabricated this film, it would certainly have been made in better quality," comments Mike Inchalik from the "Casablanca" studio.
The reconstruction was based on four copies of reports from the Moon, from CBS News, the National Archives, Australian television, and a video recording from a camera that... filmed the TV screen on July 20, 1969.
At yesterday's press conference regarding the missing tapes, Armstrong had the last word - his letter regarding the video recording from the mission was read. "I'm surprised that anything has survived at all," he said.
If earth is flat how do you explain that on seas ships disappear beyond horizon and when they appear you first see the top of it etc?
I mean seriously. But long ago everyone believed earth is flat and anyone who didn't was branded a conspiracy theorist/burned at the stake or proclaimed insane by the church. In that sense these times are not that different. It all depends on what the "majority" believes but its wrong to think that way. Even though I don't believe Earth is flat lol. But you need to watch out and think critically.
Unfortunately what majority of science or people believes might not necesarily be the truth. But it might not be also false or entirely false. The flat earth theory seems a bit far fetched if you ask me.
But yea remember that Gallileo did admit that he was "wrong" just in order to save his life. Even though he was later proven to be right? Seriously.
I mean seriously. But long ago everyone believed earth is flat and anyone who didn't was branded a conspiracy theorist/burned at the stake or proclaimed insane by the church. In that sense these times are not that different. It all depends on what the "majority" believes but its wrong to think that way. Even though I don't believe Earth is flat lol. But you need to watch out and think critically.
Unfortunately what majority of science or people believes might not necesarily be the truth. But it might not be also false or entirely false. The flat earth theory seems a bit far fetched if you ask me.
But yea remember that Gallileo did admit that he was "wrong" just in order to save his life. Even though he was later proven to be right? Seriously.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2022
- Messages
- 7,468
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- The Wired
- Website
- m4x1mumrez87.neocities.org
- XP
- 21,163
- Country
Luke has been banned btw or so it seems.If Luke believes that the Earth is flat, his head would not be round.
- Status
Similar threads
-
@
BigOnYa:
A friend give me a $35 cigar, and pssf, just as good as a $5 one. But of course gonna have to tell him it was awesome. -
@
Psionic Roshambo:
What makes a good Cuban rum soaked cigar is a nice cosmopolitan to go with it.+1 -
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
There was this little bar I would stop in have that combo and watch the beach+1
-
@
BigOnYa:
I've never met a girl named cosmopolitan, but cool. And where do you insert the cigar? Mr clinton
-
-
-
-
-
@
BigOnYa:
Yea wish I could get Cubans cheap, they are ridiculous priced up here. But they are hard workers.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I'm deliberately vague about some of the details sure it's been 30 years but some crimes don't have limitations
-
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
Back then I was so wasteful with money, didn't bother me to spend 600 bucks in a strip club, some of those private dances though... Lol
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
My life back then was a mix of Breaking Bad and John Wick and Dumb and Dumber lol+1
-
-
-
