Skizzo said:
God forbid anyone ever criticize someone who is doing something for free.
....
what do you think the minimum amount charged has to be in order to allow someone to criticize your work without getting flamed or called ungrateful, just out of curiosity?
[.....bunch of crap to cut out of this to make it shorter....blah blah...I'm a seven-year-old...]
And I'll ignore your little bitch comment and chalk it up to you just being another member of the SU team.
...It was just bitch, not "little," and I left it open for anyone to choose their own appended category, though apparently you feel that one was aimed at you :-)
Alas Skizzo, try again, since I was borrowing your own language upon the use of "flame" and "criticize"...which are separated by the total lack (in this thread) of
analyzing by those supposedly evaluating. Since "flame" is slang (not even, merely e-slang), and can essentially mean a variety of things the user wants it to mean, you fail again.
I am VERY impressed however, that you possess the basic skills to address a dictionary, though I'm sure you looked no further than Google for that.
You're wasting your energy on trying to rise just a notch above pathetic, and no one here cares what team you think I'm on, which is/was the most nonsensical thing anyone has said on this forum in days.
The fact is waninkoko is known not just for useful, free wii programs, but for minor bugs in those same programs, that luckily are almost always accompanied quite soon by corresponding bug fixes. Big deal, it's not anything shocking, and certainly nothing insurmountable, and none of the people "bitching" about it "found the fault" to begin with, they were just told about it and chimed in.
[I'm trying to guess: "SU" ---...suck-up team? is that it?....I hope its more clever than that...take your time, pm it to me if you'd like, you can really stop posting in this thread, so people can get help with stuff.]