Oh really, well how generous of you. As you didn't reply to any of the points I made in my posts - I will respond in kind,I'll give you another shot. This time I'll be extra generous and provide no response limit.
Maybe because your points aren't worth my time? Or I may be cooking up a long response for you?Oh really, well how generous of you. As you didn't reply to any of the points I made in my posts - I will respond in kind,
So in other words your telling me that the belief thatThere are places in the world where someone with your views would be executed, so don't expect everyone to think some of the perverse things you believe in are acceptable to all - they aren't, get over it.
There's a line between deviant behavior, and straight up harming others and making it legal to do so because it's political viable, you should be aware of this oh great one. Maybe homophobia isn't and shouldn't accepted, nor should it be legalized in a way that protects someone from criminal penalties since their religion said to do so. Which the republican party in Texas, wants to do.You especially seem to hate Republicans and anyone that doesn't agree with deviant behavior
You seem to be obsessed with gay stuff and trans stuff. Nobody gives a hoot if you want to prance around in a dress and call yourself whatever you want. As for your interpretation of laws, well since I assume you're not a lawyer or in any position to make laws, you should stop whining and leave that stuff to people that spent years of their lives studying the law.Maybe because your points aren't worth my time? Or I may be cooking up a long response for you?
So in other words your telling me that the belief that
this statement right here
"we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values."
that this is blatantly homophobic since it allows for someone to beat up a gay person and receive no criminal penalties if their religion says to do it.
That I would be executed for being against homophobic people... Alright. Go on.
Really? Nobody gives a hoot?you seem to be obsessed with gay stuff and trans stuff. Nobody gives a hoot
that's not laws, those are written agendas for the republican party. So your argument here is null.As for your interpretation of laws, well since I assume you're not a lawyer or in any position to make laws, you should stop whining and leave that stuff to people that spent years of their lives studying the law.
So in other words your telling me to love a party that is actively looking to, and hurting gay and trans people?Your posts are unhinged and you have a lot of hate in you, have you tried seeking therapy from a professional.
Yep, NOBODY gives a hoot about your trans stuff
Yep, I'm all for paragraph 317 as well. Marriage should only be for men and women, as it has been for thousands of years and still is in most parts of the world. The gays can have a civil partnership or whatever, after all it's just a bit of paper isn't it.View attachment 316496
Republican party, clearly cares about it. We already went through this.
thanks for your mask off moment. Your homophobic. no question about it at this point.Marriage is should only be for men and women
Your religion only applies to you, your religion does not apply to me. Your rights end where mine start, and mine ends where your starts. So no, I'm not discriminating against your religion. I'm discrimanating against your attempt to use you religion over my rights.Most religions in the world belive marriage is only between a man and a woman - are you discriminating against religous people? Some would call you a bigot with that attitude.
And you don't have the right to regulate marriage so it only applies to your view. Your being exclusionary, that's being a bigot. The actual definition:Your gay/trans views only apply to you, they don't apply to me
No, I'm fine with religious people, I've been blessed by the hand by a christrian as non christian. I've gone through buddhism, Chrisanity and Wiccan.You already admitted you despise Repubilcans and those who's religious views don't accept your views on the gays or trans being married
No, I'm neither. Because unlike the republican party, I don't hate them because I have extreme vitrol in my heart or fear of others. I hate them because they actively hurt others. My hatred of them comes from a source of love for people, as I watch their rights, their life violated by a political party, and makes me angry. My rage comes from the need to protect people, and watching someone/party actively kick them down over and over and over again, forcefully triggering that response of needing to protect.You started swearing and getting all uppity when your views were challenged. Basically you are an unhinged bigot and also a hypocrite.
Gay marriage is a form of cultural appropriation, in fact all the said core values of the so called Woke movement are culturally appropriated.And you don't have the right to regulate marriage so it only applies to your view. Your being exclusionary, that's being a bigot. The actual definition:
a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.
marriage is a cultural universal. Almost every civilization had some form of it. So no, it's not.Gay marriage is a form of cultural appropriation
There's no woke movement. That is you being told they are. There was a hatred for left handed people. It was so strong, that left handed people faded out of existence due to the culture non stop forcing and turning them away. Only until they were accepted into society, did suddenly many show up, until it plateaued. Because more and more of them got to become comfortable with who they were.in fact all the said core values of the so called Woke movement are culturally appropriated.
1. Marriage was a spiritual rite practiced by cultures around the world, it's key is in the religious systems which are mirroring natural design. The Male and the Female unite into one flesh, both figuratively through the union of opposites, the two made one, etc. and literally through the process of reproduction.marriage is a cultural universal. Almost every civilization had some form of it. So no, it's not.
There's no woke movement. That is you being told they are. There was a hatred for left handed people. It was so strong, that left handed people faded out of existence due to the culture non stop forcing and turning them away. Only until they were accepted into society, did suddenly many show up, until it plateaued. Because more and more of them got to become comfortable with who they were.
How is what we are seeing here any different? That party has associated Gay, LGBTQ people as woke. And they want you to be against them.
How is this no different than Christians battering the hands of left handed people because "it invokes the devil"
How is erasing their existance, through making it harder for them to talk about who they are, any different from that.