Hacking Is WBFS as Terrible As I Think it Is?

W hat

Rhythm Heaven Fan
OP
Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
632
Trophies
1
XP
697
Country
United States
How are the recovery options? How likely is it to blow up in your face? How do these answers compare to FAT and NTFS? Which is the optimal filesystem for USB loaders, if there is one?
 

LocoRoco

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
320
Trophies
0
XP
71
Country
misteromar said:
How is WBFS outdated? Its got to better than fat32.


simple you can use fat32/ntfs load games,apps,movies etc of one partition and windows recognizes the format.
 

FIX94

Former Staff
Former Staff
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
7,284
Trophies
0
Age
30
Location
???
XP
11,248
Country
Germany
WBFS is as fast as FAT32 and NTFS. The games on a WBFS parition using more space. It's also easier to fix problems on a FAT32 or NTFS parition, because you can access them directly.
 

Wiimm

Developer
Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
2,292
Trophies
1
Location
Germany
Website
wiimmfi.de
XP
1,519
Country
Germany
I have a 500gb drive divided into 300gb WBFS and 200gb FAT. The disc usage is 130gb+15gb. WBFS is fast and stable and easy to handle (bash scripts using wwt). WBFS checking and recovering is available. No fragmenting probs on FAT because missing large file adding+removing. 1:1 dumping with cgf loader works perfect.

I see no reason to change it.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: @K3Nv2, Very accurate.