I use Retroarch on the Switch because a standalone GBA emulator I tried a few years ago had audio glitches but Retroarch hasn't given me any problems. On the PC I use standalone emulators just out of habit.
Retroarch or standalone emulators?
- Thread starter pig_slaughterer69
- Start date
- Views 1,831
- Replies 3
Matter of preference really. On the Switch, retroarch is the best available for a lot of emulated platforms, but standalone mGBA should be just as good as the retroarch mGBA core.
I know some people don't like the complexity of all the retroarch menus, and prefer standalone for that reason, but yeah really just use what works best for you.
I know some people don't like the complexity of all the retroarch menus, and prefer standalone for that reason, but yeah really just use what works best for you.
Similar threads
-
-
-
-
-
@
BigOnYa:
Yea but to play the next gen games, you must have those games on internal, or buy the official ssd expansion cards, which are expensive -
-
-
@
MysticStarlight:
A surge protector is a device that protects your electronics from fluctuations. I recommend having your console plugged into one of those -
@
MysticStarlight:
An UPS is even better because it has an internal battery that keeps your system on even if the power goes out, but it's much more expensive obviously
-
@
Xdqwerty:
@MysticStarlight, oh i recall seeing one in some in the houses of some relatives, including my dad's apartment -
@
Xdqwerty:
@MysticStarlight, although whatever device we plug into them stops getting power anyways lol
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
BigOnYa:
On the series s/x you can use a external HD but any next gen games must be on your internal ssd, or you can buy a ssd expansion card, but pricey. Any xbone, 360, or og Xbox games can be played from external tho.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
