Kinda, Sys-Patch is a sysmodule which patch the memory on the fly at startup, detect if any patch is already applied and if any patch is missing and apply them so if you didn't boot trough Hekate's Package3 parsing Sys-Patch will take care.
Homebrew Homebrew app sys-patch - sysmod that patches on boot
- Thread starter TotalJustice
- Start date
- Views 117,347
- Replies 393
- Likes 109
Is it normal that log says Unpatched for es6?
Also, I have the latest sigpatches installed and I have loaded Atmosphere's package3 via Hekate. Shouldn't logs say Patched in orange instead of green or am I missing something? es6 is Unpatched, es7 is Patched and the rest of them are Patched.
Also, I have the latest sigpatches installed and I have loaded Atmosphere's package3 via Hekate. Shouldn't logs say Patched in orange instead of green or am I missing something? es6 is Unpatched, es7 is Patched and the rest of them are Patched.
Last edited by Blythe93,
All I know is that ES have something to do with ES_NCA (or 0100000000000033) but not sure what ES6 is.
EDIT: Checked old backed up sourcecode, ES6 might not be in use anymore therefore not needed on FW18
constinit Patterns es_patterns[] = {
{ "es1", "0x1F90013128928052", -4, 0, cbz_cond, b_patch, b_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es2", "0xC07240F9E1930091", -4, 0, tbz_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(10,2,0) },
{ "es3", "0xF3031FAA02000014", -4, 0, bne_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(10,2,0) },
{ "es4", "0xC0FDFF35A8C35838", -4, 0, mov_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(11,0,0), MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es5", "0xE023009145EEFF97", -4, 0, cbz_cond, b_patch, b_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(11,0,0), MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es6", "0x.6300...0094A0..D1..FF97", 16, 0, mov2_cond, mov0_patch, mov0_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(14,0,0) },
};
So I guess es7 is just a replacement for es6
EDIT: Checked old backed up sourcecode, ES6 might not be in use anymore therefore not needed on FW18
constinit Patterns es_patterns[] = {
{ "es1", "0x1F90013128928052", -4, 0, cbz_cond, b_patch, b_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es2", "0xC07240F9E1930091", -4, 0, tbz_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(10,2,0) },
{ "es3", "0xF3031FAA02000014", -4, 0, bne_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(10,2,0) },
{ "es4", "0xC0FDFF35A8C35838", -4, 0, mov_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(11,0,0), MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es5", "0xE023009145EEFF97", -4, 0, cbz_cond, b_patch, b_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(11,0,0), MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es6", "0x.6300...0094A0..D1..FF97", 16, 0, mov2_cond, mov0_patch, mov0_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(14,0,0) },
};
So I guess es7 is just a replacement for es6
Last edited by linuxares,
ES6 and ES7 are the 2 versions of the set of patterns to seek ES6 is for FW 14 to 17 and ES7 is for FW 14 to 18 I think they booth are overlapping, but if one of the two is patched, then the patch is applied.:
as far I could understand the code needs to change the reg pattern to look but on the new code just a new set of codes was added.
I know about that, but nevertheless, I've figured it out. For some reason, my hekate_ipl was missing the kip1patch=nosigchk line.
Now they are all orange which means that both sigpatches and sys-patch module are working (and doing the same thing).I see. Thanks for the info.
Thanks to everyone who made these sigpatches possible. You guys rock!
I know about that, but nevertheless, I've figured it out. For some reason, my hekate_ipl was missing the kip1patch=nosigchk line.
I see. Thanks for the info.
Thanks to everyone who made these sigpatches possible. You guys rock!
Mine are orange except for ctest, which is green. Is that supposed to be green with both sigpatches and sys-patch?
I also noticed in the sys-patch options that Patch sysMMC is set to on by default. Shouldn't that be set to off?
And what exactly is Version Skip for? Config says 1=(default) skips out of date patterns, 0=search all patterns. Anyone know the benefit or disadvantage of using one or the other?
Last edited by RedColoredStars,
Green = patched correctly
Orange = already patched (by the sigpatches you already installed)
I don't remember what the version skip does
(woops got passed over)
thanks but I am only the messenger
Post automatically merged:
Unpatched = the pattern was not found so no need to be patched.Green = patched correctly
Orange = already patched (by the sigpatches you already installed)
I don't remember what the version skip does
So if I understand correctly, with the version skip OFF it just applies everything, with version skip ON it apply just what it needs ?
That didn't answer my questions.
Let me ask the first one in a different way. If they should all be orange if I have both sigpatches and sys-patch, what would be the reason my ctest is the only one that's green? As far as the other two, the post you linked to (whih I had already seen) doesn't mention either the Patch sysMMC or Version Skip options.
Edit: Version Skip was answered while I was replying.
Similar threads
-
- Locked
- Portal
-
The Real Jdbye
*is birb* -
Dumpflam
-
Veho
-
-
-
-
@
BakerMan:
Update on my brother: He's home now, tired and hungry, obviously, but other than that, seems to be doing fine.+2 -
-
-
@
BakerMan:
Well, from what I've heard from my parents, he had a seizure last night, perhaps an epileptic episode, fucking died, had a near death experience, my dad called the paramedics, they showed up, took him to the hospital, and he woke up covered in tubes, and started complaining.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
