Hardware does running the C.P.U. at 100% usage for long periods damage the PC ?

hooky1992

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
119
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
723
Country
United States
Hi all,

I have a basic PC setup for gaming (see below for specs) which runs most games OK, however some titles push the C.P.U. usage up to 100%, which can only be remedied by reducing the quality of the graphics (reduce to 30 fps, set shadows to low, etc ...).

My question is: does running the C.P.U. at 100% usage for long periods damage the PC ?

The Intel website says modern CPUs are designed to run safely at 100% CPU utilization: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/gaming/resources/how-to-fix-high-cpu-usage.html

I have also read online that 100% usage doesn't damage the CPU as long as it is not running at high temperatures over 95C, with the optimal temperature being just under 80C.

I could always upgrade to an i7 processor and/or get a better cooling system, but would rather invest the money in a better PC instead further down the line. All feedback is welcome !

My PC set up consists of:
  • Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF desktop computer
  • Windows 10 Pro (64 bit)
  • Intel i5 4570 (quad core 3.2GHz)
  • 24GB RAM (DDR3)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 LP graphics card (4GB GDDR5)
 

Reploid

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
2,841
Trophies
2
XP
6,360
Country
Serbia, Republic of
Prolly not. If it works - it's fine, if it'll overheat it'll shutdown. Theoretically you can fry your CPU if you overvolt it extremely, but prolly hard to do with modern hardware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StrayGuitarist

Kazesama

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
258
Trophies
2
Location
Earth
XP
1,234
Country
United States
Haswell CPUs are known to be hot. But it should be fine, as long as your temps are acceptable. The CPU will throttle if it gets too hot anyways.
 

zamastyle

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Messages
176
Trophies
0
XP
274
Country
United States
Its not the running at 100% that potentially does damage. Its the heat byproduct created by that level of performance. If your system is able to effectively keep the cpu cool under full load, then you should be fine.
 

Hayato213

Newcomer
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
20,094
Trophies
1
XP
21,291
Country
United States
Hi all,

I have a basic PC setup for gaming (see below for specs) which runs most games OK, however some titles push the C.P.U. usage up to 100%, which can only be remedied by reducing the quality of the graphics (reduce to 30 fps, set shadows to low, etc ...).

My question is: does running the C.P.U. at 100% usage for long periods damage the PC ?

The Intel website says modern CPUs are designed to run safely at 100% CPU utilization: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/gaming/resources/how-to-fix-high-cpu-usage.html

I have also read online that 100% usage doesn't damage the CPU as long as it is not running at high temperatures over 95C, with the optimal temperature being just under 80C.

I could always upgrade to an i7 processor and/or get a better cooling system, but would rather invest the money in a better PC instead further down the line. All feedback is welcome !

My PC set up consists of:
  • Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF desktop computer
  • Windows 10 Pro (64 bit)
  • Intel i5 4570 (quad core 3.2GHz)
  • 24GB RAM (DDR3)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 LP graphics card (4GB GDDR5)

The max temperature for i5-4570 is 73 C, so you might want to check the cpu temperture, as it been stated already running at 100% isn't the problem, overheating is the problem if you don't have proper cooling.
 

hooky1992

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
119
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
723
Country
United States

hooky1992

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
119
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
723
Country
United States
thank you for confirming max temp of 73C (as does Intel: https://www.intel.com/content/www/u...to-3-60-ghz/specifications.html?wapkw=i5-4570), I will run some tests to see what sort of temperatures I can hit when maxing out the PC

So .... I cranked up my modded version of Grand Theft Auto 4 to 60 f.p.s and triggered a max stars police chase, and the CPU usage shot up to 100% and hovered around the high 90s thereafter.

The temperature of CPU itself gradually creeped up to over 72C after less than 5 minutes (see image below) so I will therefore either have to degrade my graphics settings or invest in new cooling system ....


1700164284250.jpeg
 

AkikoKumagara

The Coolest Bear Around
Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
1,543
Trophies
1
Website
thebearsden.web.fc2.com
XP
3,974
Country
United States
so I will therefore either have to degrade my graphics settings or invest in new cooling system ....
It's not always this simple. Often, increasing graphics settings actually reduces the load on the CPU (as it then leverages the graphics card more). This is especially true when it comes to settings like anti-aliasing and render resolution.
 

Ryab

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2017
Messages
3,270
Trophies
1
XP
4,537
Country
United States
So .... I cranked up my modded version of Grand Theft Auto 4 to 60 f.p.s and triggered a max stars police chase, and the CPU usage shot up to 100% and hovered around the high 90s thereafter.

The temperature of CPU itself gradually creeped up to over 72C after less than 5 minutes (see image below) so I will therefore either have to degrade my graphics settings or invest in new cooling system ....


View attachment 404555
CPUs will throttle themselves if they get too hot.
 

ganjo

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 14, 2023
Messages
20
Trophies
0
Age
45
XP
127
Country
United States
As long as the system isnt overheating its perfectly fine. Throttling is fine but if its always at the limits you need better cooling. Could be as simple as more/better intake or exhaust fans or a better CPU cooler. Do you have the stock cooler?

Id use HWINFO instead of speccy to monitor temps. There are numerous temp sensors and some apps dont use the correct one. HWINFO will show you all of them including temps of other critical hardware in your PC.

The 4th intel is 10 years old. Id bet the IHS needs to be de-lided and the thermal replaced. That would probably be the biggest help.
 

Hayato213

Newcomer
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
20,094
Trophies
1
XP
21,291
Country
United States
Air flow is important, tower PC have better air flow than small form factor PC, if you haven't change the thermal paste in years it is time to change it.
 

Armadillo

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Messages
4,290
Trophies
3
XP
5,312
Country
United Kingdom
So .... I cranked up my modded version of Grand Theft Auto 4 to 60 f.p.s and triggered a max stars police chase, and the CPU usage shot up to 100% and hovered around the high 90s thereafter.

The temperature of CPU itself gradually creeped up to over 72C after less than 5 minutes (see image below) so I will therefore either have to degrade my graphics settings or invest in new cooling system ....
I wouldn't be worried about that.

Listing that Intel give for anything before 7th gen is Tcase (spot where the ihs meets the heatsink). There's no sensor there.

Temperature software gives is either:
Tjunction (the cores, temperature sensor in the Silicon).
Package (256ms average of all cores)
Something like "CPU" (could be labeled tcase, could be anything, depends on board). A temperature sensor vaguely near the cpu or just some sort of calculation based off core temps. Also fairly useless when you have the actual core temps available.

Tcase is such a useless measurement for the end user, Intel even stopped using it for 7th gen and switched to tjunction (an actual useful measurement for the end user). 6th gen went from 72 max (tcase) to 7th gen 100C max (tjunction), nothing changed between 6th and 7th to warrant that jump between gens other than Intel starting to use tjunction instead of tcase.

Tjunction is also what is used by the processor for thermal throttling. CPU will throttle well before any issues as well.

Unfortunately Intel don't give Tjunction for older processors. Coretemp and hwinfo will show you a max Tjunc, which is based on when the cpu throttles.

If you're not throttling, I wouldn't be stripping down and messing around to chase a Tcase temp that you can't even read, that was so useless to the end user, even Intel changed to listing Tjunc.
 

hooky1992

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
119
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
723
Country
United States
As long as the system isnt overheating its perfectly fine. Throttling is fine but if its always at the limits you need better cooling. Could be as simple as more/better intake or exhaust fans or a better CPU cooler. Do you have the stock cooler?

Id use HWINFO instead of speccy to monitor temps. There are numerous temp sensors and some apps dont use the correct one. HWINFO will show you all of them including temps of other critical hardware in your PC.

The 4th intel is 10 years old. Id bet the IHS needs to be de-lided and the thermal replaced. That would probably be the biggest help.
I replaced the thermal paste a few months back, didnt make any difference ;)
Post automatically merged:

I wouldn't be worried about that.

Listing that Intel give for anything before 7th gen is Tcase (spot where the ihs meets the heatsink). There's no sensor there.

Temperature software gives is either:
Tjunction (the cores, temperature sensor in the Silicon).
Package (256ms average of all cores)
Something like "CPU" (could be labeled tcase, could be anything, depends on board). A temperature sensor vaguely near the cpu or just some sort of calculation based off core temps. Also fairly useless when you have the actual core temps available.

Tcase is such a useless measurement for the end user, Intel even stopped using it for 7th gen and switched to tjunction (an actual useful measurement for the end user). 6th gen went from 72 max (tcase) to 7th gen 100C max (tjunction), nothing changed between 6th and 7th to warrant that jump between gens other than Intel starting to use tjunction instead of tcase.

Tjunction is also what is used by the processor for thermal throttling. CPU will throttle well before any issues as well.

Unfortunately Intel don't give Tjunction for older processors. Coretemp and hwinfo will show you a max Tjunc, which is based on when the cpu throttles.

If you're not throttling, I wouldn't be stripping down and messing around to chase a Tcase temp that you can't even read, that was so useless to the end user, even Intel changed to listing Tjunc.

Thanks for your suggestion ! so I downloaded HWINFO and ran it side by side with Speccy with no game running to get a baseline:

CPU - no game running.PNG




then I played my heavily modded GTA4 just at normal 30 f.p.s and got the cops to chase me:

CPU - 100 percent load.png


seems very similar to me, quick look on the internet gives the following:

Speccy - CPU Average Temperature = the temperature reading of the hottest core only
HWINFO - CPU Package = a 256 ms average of the hottest temperature among all sensors in CPU
 
Last edited by hooky1992,

Kazesama

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
258
Trophies
2
Location
Earth
XP
1,234
Country
United States
imo those are acceptable temperatures, at least it's not thermal throttling. You could undervolt your GPU to lower the case's ambient temps.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    ^this
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    It's important for society to be healthy and educated. If those things can't happen because all of the institutions that prop up those industries make it unattainable for all but a small portion of society, then your society is largely going to be disease ridden, dying, and uneducated in very short order.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Issue is it's too rich of a coperation already with bad sugar diets causing diabetes and killing teeth a new set of teeth around 90k
  • cearp @ cearp:
    I agree it's not easy for the average American, let alone the ones below that average. Free / cheaper healthcare is much more important I think than free university education.
    Of course like @mthrnite said, why not both. But I doubt both will get solved at once, and surely healthcare is top priority.
    +1
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    they go hand in hand unless you want a plumber performing your triple bypass
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Everyone should be Medicaid elegable for implants at the most
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    If it's needed to keep you healthy it shouldn't cost you $90k. The fact that it does is an enormous problem
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    but yeah, affordable is all i'm asking for
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    i'd be happy with affordable dentures
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    With my old dentist he even encouraged switching insurance every quarter
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    And if the concern is that "well we can't trust the government to intervene for this because the government can't do anything right and wastes tons of money" then holy shit push for a better government. I'm certainly trying to. Don't throw your hands up and go "we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas"
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Plus technology cost iirc even a water jet drill is 1k per
  • cearp @ cearp:
    @K3Nv2 that's crazily expensive. how long will that take to pay off?

    Although diet is largely education, people don't need to go to university to learn what's healthy and what's not,
    it's the whole country, big corporations and advertising that is to blame for leading most of the population to believe that poptarts and froot loops are healthy to feed a child
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    i would think the population knows better but with food deserts and abject poverty, sometimes a poptart gonna have to do.
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    it's a big ol complicated world innit
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    As someone who went through the grade school system in the US some time within the past 30 or so years, not nearly enough is done to promote and educate on how to eat healthy in a way that is feasible to do on a regular basis and also affordable. Eating healthy is, comparatively, fucking expensive. So is eating unhealthy, but in many cases eating unhealthy is more affordable than eating healthy
    +1
  • cearp @ cearp:
    90k could get you a 3 bedroom house in some poorer parts of the country
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    @cearp, it's like buying a new car most dentists say so $250 per the rest of your life
  • cearp @ cearp:
    Jesus
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    These are actual implants to dentures though
  • cearp @ cearp:
    Well once it's all done I'm sure you'll be happy with the result
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Just a flappity denture would probably be 5k
  • mthrnite @ mthrnite:
    sold
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    I got some faith implants are going to justbe included with a crown cost
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Procedures bullshit wait 4 months for graft to heal wait another four months the post to heal then get crown
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Procedures bullshit wait 4 months for graft to heal wait another four months the post to heal...