You mean that Nintendo had their first party games focus on gameplay rather than over-glorified graphics?
With such wonderful games like Wii Sports and Wii Party.
Also, implying that the Wii competitors didn't have better games.
I was implying that graphics aren't the be-all end-all of what makes a game crappy or fun. Yes, graphics are irrefutably important, but if game has hyper realistic graphics but the gameplay sucks, then where are you? Gameplay is often the more important factor, if superior hardware made better games 100% of the time, the Sega Genesis would have outsold the Snes (which had a weaker CPU than the Genesis). Super Smash Bros Brawl, Mario Kart Wii, Skyward Sword, Twilight Princess, Sonic Colors, the list goes on. To say the Wii didn't have any good games is like saying Ubisoft doesn't believe in using piracy-inducing DRM.