no.Wouldn't it be easier to "just" port spacecraft-nx to the rp2040?
that's not how mafia worksWouldn't it be easier to "just" port spacecraft-nx to the rp2040?
nop, because Spacecraft is only the last part of the trick, the SX-ish clones have a FPGA code which does great part of the magic and "That" code is the one has getting our hair pulled.Wouldn't it be easier to "just" port spacecraft-nx to the rp2040?
I saw you redacted your comment but interestingly the ASIC that sits in between the Tegra and the cartridge also uses that CMD63 command.I honestly think it really was CMD63
Tbh the hair pulling is mostly the emmc communicationnop, because Spacecraft is only the last part of the trick, the SX-ish clones have a FPGA code which does great part of the magic and "That" code is the one has getting our hair pulled.
Considering these are for the FPGA and FPGAs don't really count in time but clock pulses these may be clock pulse counts. Probably offsets from a certain glitch start point.speaking of which, this is in the HWFLY-NX source code in glitch.c at line 217:
these are the timing offsets for the glitching, that's cool and all but I've got one question:C:const uint16_t erista_offsets[] = {825, 830, 835, 840, 845, 850, 855, 860, 865, 870, 875, 880, 885, 890, 895, 900, 905}; const uint16_t mariko_offsets[] = {800, 805, 810, 815, 820, 825, 830, 835, 840, 845, 850, 855, 860, 865, 870, 875, 880};
What time scale is that? Like, is the first mariko offset 800ns or is it 800 * X ns or what?
This thread consists of 99% children asking "is it done yet" in various ways, so no, barelySo we are getting progress slowly?
Is that what I've gotten from this last few pages (its after midnight when I posted this and need sleep)
Don’t know about that. There’s a few here that have posted interesting tidbits that make me believe they’ll figure it out eventually, they’re just not updating us as quickly as some of us would like or with as much detail as some of us require. Work like this very rarely happens in the open.This thread consists of 99% children asking "is it done yet" in various ways, so no, barely
Even if they are children, they will still not be able to put this chip on their console.This thread consists of 99% children asking "is it done yet" in various ways, so no, barely
I’m not sure it was meant that way… but this reads as if you (or someone else here) are owed something.they’re just not updating us as quickly as some of us would like or with as much detail as some of us require.
It wasn’t. Being honest, I have zero skin in this game. I’ve got two unpatched Switches and zero patched Switches. Just interested in these kinds of things and like to see progress.I’m not sure it was meant that way… but this reads as if you (or someone else here) are owed something.
Which would be rather unfortunate frame of reference.
right, makes senseConsidering these are for the FPGA and FPGAs don't really count in time but clock pulses these may be clock pulse counts. Probably offsets from a certain glitch start point.
base clock of the target hardware is also often used.right, makes sense
I thought the FPGA has its own clock, guess not.
This thread consists of 99% children asking "is it done yet" in various ways, so no, barely
Yes, they are the same. The reference is on page 34. The firmware there doesn’t work btw…yet.I have a fresh Lite with soldered Hwfly. I could test some things if that is important. Bought 2 Pi´s too a while ago. I presume the solder points on the motherboard are the same