GitLab has taken down the Suyu Nintendo Switch emulator

Suyu-728x410.png

Emulator takedowns continue. Not long after its first release, Suyu emulator has been removed from GitLab via a DMCA takedown. Suyu was a Nintendo Switch emulator forked from Yuzu emulator, which was the high-profile subject of a takedown by Nintendo last month. GitLab deleted Suyu's repository, stating that they'd received a takedown notice for the project. The tongue-in-cheek named emulator still has an official website up, though the Discord is not allowing new members, and the GitLab download page is gone. However, it seems a self-hosted download page is still available.

:arrow: Source
:arrow: Takedown notice (courtesy of gamingonlinux)
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2024
Messages
8
Trophies
0
XP
122
Country
Canada
If Nintendo own the code, they can sue anyone distribute it i think.
I think they can only "reasonably" (or legally within the settlement) sue people distributing it that are in talks with the original Yuzu devs. Again, I'm no lawyer, but this is what I got after reading the settlement and reading about it online and stuff.
Of course, they probably could go after people making the forks, but I don't think they'd go after "HentaiLover69" on Github for forking Yuzu. Suyu obviously is the most popular Yuzu fork atm, so it remains to be seen if Nintendo's gonna do what they Nintendo.
 

Nincompoopdo

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
604
Trophies
0
XP
2,726
Country
United States
I think Nintendo's real target is Citra, not Yuzu. Their legal argument has to do with TotK, but why take so long for them to sue? If they want, they could have destroyed Yuzu and Ryujinx a long time ago.

The next Nintendo hardware will play host to DS and 3DS games, just like current Switch is GB and GBA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaTh

AlexMCS

Human
Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
633
Trophies
0
Age
38
Location
Fortaleza
XP
2,910
Country
Brazil

Paralel

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
100
Trophies
1
XP
1,194
Country
United States
Why are people saying it is down? I can access it just fine:

https://gitlab.com/suyu-emu

Anyone that wants the latest Windows release just needs to go here:

https://gitlab.com/suyu-emu/suyu-re...yu-Windows_x64.7z?ref_type=heads&inline=false

Anyone that wants the latest Mac release just needs to go here:

https://gitlab.com/suyu-emu/suyu-re...u-macOS-arm64.dmg?ref_type=heads&inline=false

Anyone that wants the latest Android release just needs to go here:

https://gitlab.com/suyu-emu/suyu-re...nline-release.apk?ref_type=heads&inline=false

Anyone that wants the latest Linux release just needs to go here:

https://gitlab.com/suyu-emu/suyu-re...inline--.AppImage?ref_type=heads&inline=false

Although, anyone that wants the source code needs to go to Archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/2024032.../archive/v0.0.2-master/suyu-v0.0.2-master.zip

https://web.archive.org/web/2024032.../archive/v0.0.2-master/suyu-v0.0.2-master.tar

https://web.archive.org/web/2024032...hive/v0.0.2-master/suyu-v0.0.2-master.tar.bz2

https://web.archive.org/web/2024032...chive/v0.0.2-master/suyu-v0.0.2-master.tar.gz


Edit:

Going by this:

https://gitlab.com/groups/suyu-emu/-/activity

It looks like Git made its move 9 hours ago, so just about 3 PM EDT on March 21st, without telling any of the owners, developers, or maintainers.

Also, everyone that is attached to the project is now blocked on GitLab:

https://gitlab.com/groups/suyu-emu/-/group_members

That is some really slimy behavior by Git.

Edit 2:

For the Mac people that have M type CPUs on MacOS Sonoma 14.4, if Suyu doesn't work, the suggestion is to install qt manually using
Code:
brew install qt
 
Last edited by Paralel,

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,829
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,797
Country
United States
If Nintendo own the code, they can sue anyone distribute it i think.
AFAIK Nintendo seized EVERYTHING belonging to the yuzu/citra team, which makes the code of the emulator itself Nintendo property.
Yuzu was fully open source software up until the very moment it was removed from all host sites. Nintendo cannot retroactively change its open source license, so it's completely legal and falls within the terms of that license to create new forks of Yuzu. Only the employees of what was Tropic Haze, LLC are prohibited from continuing development work on Yuzu or any of its forks.
 

ShadowOne333

QVID PRO QVO
Editorial Team
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
12,258
Trophies
2
XP
35,080
Country
Mexico
This will keep happening as long as they keep using "pop" code hosting.
There are so many DMCA-bully-free hosting options, that are themselves free to host too, that I really don't understand why people working in grey areas insist on using github/lab.

A single google search will give you tons:

Just pick anyone not mainstream FFS.

Are there any non US based options?
Like one in Russia, China or a place where DMCA is just bs to the government?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRudyPlayZ

tech3475

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,717
Trophies
2
XP
6,139
Country
Yuzu was fully open source software up until the very moment it was removed from all host sites. Nintendo cannot retroactively change its open source license, so it's completely legal and falls within the terms of that license to create new forks of Yuzu. Only the employees of what was Tropic Haze, LLC are prohibited from continuing development work on Yuzu or any of its forks.

One problem, Nintendo can still sue them, doesn't matter whether they're right or wrong and in the US AFAIK you don't automatically get legal costs back.

It also doesn't help that Yuzu settled leaving everything ambiguous in terms of the actual legality. IIRC Nintendo's argument involved needing to modify a console to use the emulator, so even if someone makes an emulator which requires everything to be decrypted, I wouldn't be surprised if they still send a C&D/DMCA.
 

The Catboy

GBAtemp Official Catboy™: Savior of the broken
Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
28,128
Trophies
4
Location
Making a non-binary fuss
XP
39,915
Country
Antarctica
AFAIK Nintendo seized EVERYTHING belonging to the yuzu/citra team, which makes the code of the emulator itself Nintendo property.

When did they “seize everything?” It was settled out of court and they paid a settlement to Nintendo, Nintendo didn’t seize anything.
and Nintendo now OWN Yuzu's code, so anyone using it, it become illegal, they basically made using this emulator illegal.
If Nintendo own the code, they can sue anyone distribute it i think.
Please cite your source to this. I can’t find anything that says Nintendo owns the code for Yuzu

Edit: I honestly think people should stop with trying to work on Yuzu. People should focus on bringing features from Yuzu to ryujinx
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaTh

Localhorst86

Robert'); DROP TABLE members;--
Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
2,753
Trophies
1
Location
Nintendo works for my dad
XP
5,444
Country
Germany
they had "latest" patches only available if you paid for patreon.

I genuinely don't see how this particular caveat has any relevance.

We know Nintendo doesn't like emulators in general and we know they have the opinion that emulating their games without their permission is illegal, full stop.

It seems likely that they dislike it when someone makes money emulating their consoles, it just doesn't make any sense that they would particularly object to the developers putting features behind a paywall.

"We didn't like that Yuzu was not making all features free to use" seems not like something Nintendo would say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaTh

HRudyPlayZ

Developer, Gamer and Power User.
Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
371
Trophies
0
XP
2,066
Country
France
If it's actually Nintendo, then that's just the illegitimate DMCA claim #307546 by them, as usual with pretty much all Nintendo takedowns.

Yuzu wasn't illegal in any means, they just got bullied out because Nintendo had the money, that's what they actually sought after.

It wasn't partaking in DRM circumvention, as opposed to popular beliefs, even if it was, it easily falls under the DMCA exemptions.
The fact they had a Patreon means nothing legally, it obviously angered Nintendo a bit more, but that was a non-legal issue.
Based on the info we have, Yuzu didn't illegally share ROMs either, in fact TOTK didn't boot on early-access builds released a few days before the game, and required an external mod not linked with Yuzu to be playable.
The fact they had their own private ROM storage means nothing either, as it could very well be a shared Nintendo account for buying and dumping games, which isn't too unheard of and would actually be fully legal. And even then would mean nothing about the project itself and more about the maintainers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaTh

drasglaf

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Messages
8
Trophies
0
Age
54
XP
321
Country
Spain
I genuinely don't see how this particular caveat has any relevance.

We know Nintendo doesn't like emulators in general and we know they have the opinion that emulating their games without their permission is illegal, full stop.

It seems likely that they dislike it when someone makes money emulating their consoles, it just doesn't make any sense that they would particularly object to the developers putting features behind a paywall.

"We didn't like that Yuzu was not making all features free to use" seems not like something Nintendo would say.
Nintendo has taken down fan-made games that were completely free, so it's not about them just making money. I think they've gone after Yuzu because it's the most popular Switch emulator and they were getting money directly from it. "Support us if you like our work" isn't the same as "support us and you get to try the latest build before anyone else". In the latter case they are getting a direct benefit from the emulator, and that gave Nintendo legal footing to sue Yuzu devs.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    oh man, that always goes great!
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    im sure half the responses won't be literal racial slurs or "drop table" jokes
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Look, it's China. They know what it's like when you give a poll to half a billion trolls.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    How much dollar do you think it is?
  • Veho @ Veho:
    ONE MILLION DOLLA
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    I know the pricing of electronics nowadays isn't "how much it actually costs" but "how much we can get away with", but putting up a poll is just cynical.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Probably $150 someone said Anbernic said around the same price as rg556
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    you know which game i wish they would rerelease
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    sonic unleashed
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Make it a happy meal toy
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    that game's engine is really fucking intensive so it runs like literal shit on xbox 360 and ps3
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Nah I'm getting value creep again. I look at a $50 console "but for just a few more dollars you could get XYZ" and I end up considering the Steam Deck.
    +1
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    like the lighting in that game was genuinely so good
  • Veho @ Veho:
    Not getting dragged into that again.
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    i dont get why they didn't port the one game that ran the worst on consoles, to pc
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    like you port everything to pc except the one game where it would make the most sense. why. what do you gain from this
  • Julie_Pilgrim @ Julie_Pilgrim:
    is sega just personally fucking with me? are they laughing while watching me through my kinect camera as i get up to restart my xbox for the third time because the game froze again
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Buy handhelds from five below better quality
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Valve probably going to do another refresh of the deck this fall with rog ally like specs tbh
    +1
  • Veho @ Veho:
    A smaller form factor would be nice too.
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    A shield portable 2 would be nice aye Nvidia
    +2
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    The big leap in all things tech is when carbon based chips start hitting.
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Longer battery life cooler temps and faster! What's not to like lol (probably expensive as hell)
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: Longer battery life cooler temps and faster! What's not to like lol (probably expensive as hell)