considering that "toaster" destroyed PS3 but people like to pretend that isn't true because the Cell Processor was the most overhyped thing since blast Processing. just like they like to pretend that the switch is just a portable ps3 when its vastly more powerful people just seem to forget how bad ps3 looked/performed
It didn't destroy PS3, it just had a better GPU and more RAM. The GamePad hogged resources if you tried to do anything fancy with it, hence why Breath Of The Wild doesn't even bother using it. It pushes the console to its absolute limits. Turns out developers also needed an actually good CPU alongside the rest of the hardware...
it did destroy the ps3 but since its Nintendo people have it set in there minds that it could never be more powerful which is an argument that has been going on for eons because people just hear hype about cell and see a big number like 3200MHz and go ooooo pretty without understanding how little that number actually means. the ps3 had to use so much blur in its games to cover up imperfections/low resoultions and couldn't even hit 30FPS in most game
@
SenorED:
