If Stargate SG-1 was good, why didn't we have Stargate SG-2?

Flame

Me > You
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
7,326
Trophies
3
XP
19,116
Country
United Kingdom
Because SG-2 wouldn't be as good as SG-1.

047b2f0a3cf855adc4aeda35bc3aadf7.gif


Conspiracy !
 

iball

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
2
Trophies
1
XP
96
Country
Gambia, The
They actually did, they just didn't name it "SG-2". They called it "Stargate Atlantis". It did well enough, lasting for 5 seasons.
SG-3 aka "Stargate Universe" didn't do as well as either of its predecessors and was canceled after a single season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flame

Flame

Me > You
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
7,326
Trophies
3
XP
19,116
Country
United Kingdom
They actually did, they just didn't name it "SG-2". They called it "Stargate Atlantis". It did well enough, lasting for 5 seasons.
SG-3 aka "Stargate Universe" didn't do as well as either of its predecessors and was canceled after a single season.

in my Universe. 2 is after 1

812f12b57769fccfe9b3f7fb5e85b1dc.gif
 

Luke94

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2016
Messages
1,206
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
1,737
Country
Poland
Who would be portraying role of colonel Jack O’ Neil nowadays? For instance Richard Dean Anderson or Chris Evans?…etc.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: https://youtube.com/shorts/gz90ppV7yfE?si=y1IdUB1kPvndhn5P