If Stargate SG-1 was good, why didn't we have Stargate SG-2?

Flame

Me > You
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
7,327
Trophies
3
XP
19,130
Country
United Kingdom
Because SG-2 wouldn't be as good as SG-1.

047b2f0a3cf855adc4aeda35bc3aadf7.gif


Conspiracy !
 

iball

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
3
Trophies
1
XP
107
Country
Gambia, The
They actually did, they just didn't name it "SG-2". They called it "Stargate Atlantis". It did well enough, lasting for 5 seasons.
SG-3 aka "Stargate Universe" didn't do as well as either of its predecessors and was canceled after a single season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flame

Flame

Me > You
OP
Global Moderator
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
7,327
Trophies
3
XP
19,130
Country
United Kingdom
They actually did, they just didn't name it "SG-2". They called it "Stargate Atlantis". It did well enough, lasting for 5 seasons.
SG-3 aka "Stargate Universe" didn't do as well as either of its predecessors and was canceled after a single season.

in my Universe. 2 is after 1

812f12b57769fccfe9b3f7fb5e85b1dc.gif
 

Luke94

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2016
Messages
1,217
Trophies
0
Age
29
XP
1,758
Country
Poland
Who would be portraying role of colonel Jack O’ Neil nowadays? For instance Richard Dean Anderson or Chris Evans?…etc.
 

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    valleck @ valleck: what is happening? i am cant load this site forums?